Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 30;17(7):1952–1960. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1852871

Table 3.

Improvement in comfort with counseling patients on the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine after an educational lecture (N = 900)

Comfort with counseling Pre-lecture
n (% agree or strongly agree)
Post-lecture
n (% agree or strongly agree)
Improveda
(freq., %)
p-valueb Results of binary logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)c
I am comfortable counseling eligible women 18–26 
years old on HPV vaccination.
Medical student
Nursing student
255 (50.0)
152 (39.5)
476 (93.5)
337 (88.0)
239 (47.1)
209 (55.7)
0.01 1.31 (0.98, 1.76)
I am comfortable counseling eligible men 18–26 
years old on HPV vaccination.
Medical student
Nursing student
236 (46.3)
145 (37.7)
475 (93.1)
330 (85.7)
255 (50.2)
214 (56.8)
0.05 1.18 (0.88, 1.59)
I am comfortable counseling parents of girls on
the HPV vaccine for their child.
Medical student
Nursing student
255 (50.4)
155 (40.4)
475 (93.1)
337 (87.5)
235 (46.6)
206 (54.8)
0.02 1.42 (1.05, 1.91)
I am comfortable counseling parents of boys on
the HPV vaccine for their child.
Medical student
Nursing student
245 (48.5)
154 (40.2)
474 (92.9)
328 (85.6)
244 (48.5)
203 (54.4)
0.08 1.24 (0.92, 1.67)
I am willing to discuss HPV vaccination when
patients come in for other problems.
Medical student
Nursing student
361 (75.7)
223 (60.0)
459 (94.4)
334 (88.1)
98 (20.8)
125 (34.9)
<0.001 2.17 (1.53, 3.07)
I need the following to be more comfortable with counseling patients/parents: b          
  • (a) More education on HPV vaccinationd


Medical student
Nursing student
432 (85.2)
362 (94.5)
167 (32.9)
218 (56.8)
300 (59.8)
155 (41.3)
<0.001 0.45 (0.34, 0.62)
  • (b) More safety data on HPV vaccinationd


Medical student
Nursing student
364 (71.7)
356 (92.2)
131 (25.6)
191 (49.9)
292 (57.6)
178 (47.2)
0.002 0.61 (0.45, 0.82)
  • (c) More time on the marketd


Medical student
Nursing student
192 (38.0)
256 (67.2)
99 (19.5)
158 (41.4)
193 (38.5)
142 (38.1)
0.99 1.00 (0.73, 1.35)
  • (d) School requirement for HPV vaccinationd


Medical student
Nursing student
213 (42.2)
254 (66.5)
120 (23.5)
170 (44.5)
192 (38.2)
141 (37.9)
0.94 1.11 (0.82, 1.50)
  • (e) Data on vaccine not promoting sexual activityd


Medical student
Nursing student
200 (39.6)
254 (66.3)
98 (19.2)
157 (40.9)
199 (39.5)
150 (40.0)
0.88 1.13 (0.83, 1.52)
I am comfortable educating vaccine hesitant
patients about HPV vaccination.
Medical student
Nursing student
275 (54.1)
168 (44.8)
445 (88.8)
313 (82.8)
206(41.4)
176 (48.8)
0.03 1.37 (1.01, 1.85)
I am comfortable offering the HPV vaccine to
patients who are:
         
  • (a) 9–10 years old


Medical student
Nursing student
230 (45.6)
165 (43.9)
423 (83.9)
312 (82.3)
230 (46.4)
166 (45.6)
0.82 1.04 (0.77, 1.40)
  • (b) 11–12 years old


Medical student
Nursing student
320 (63.5)
200 (52.6)
476 (94.1)
339 (89.0)
164 (32.9)
152 (41.1)
0.01 1.65 (1.21, 2.26)
  • (c) 13–17 years old


Medical student
Nursing student
393 (77.7)
244 (63.4)
484 (95.8)
347 (91.1)
101(20.2)
121 (32.4)
<0.001 2.25 (1.59, 3.19)
I am uncomfortable recommending a vaccine
against sexually transmitted infections.d
Medical student
Nursing student
65 (12.8)
43 (11.1)
74 (14.5)
79 (20.6)
66 (13.0)
69 (18.3)
0.03 1.95 (1.29, 2.93)

Bolded items indicate significance at p < 0.05. HPV = human papillomavirus; CI = confidence interval

aImprovement indicates a change from “disagree” or “strongly disagree” on the pre-lecture survey to “neutral,” “agree,” or “strongly agree” on the post-lecture survey for each item. A change from “neutral” on the pre-lecture survey to “agree” or “strongly agree” was also considered improvement.

bChi-square tests conducted to get p-value in unadjusted analyses. Significant p-values in adjoining column do not indicate significance in adjusted binary logistic regression analyses.

cLogistic model controlled for human papillomavirus vaccination initiation. Significant p-values in adjoining column do not indicate significance in adjusted binary logistic regression analyses.

dReverse scored items.