TABLE 4.
Comparison of adsorption capacity of PFPCS with other adsorbents reported previously.
| Adsorbents | Dye types | Qmax (mg/g) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbO/g–C3N4 | MB | 373.1 | Gan et al., 2018 |
| CMC/GOCOOH composite microbeads | MB | 180.23 | Eltaweil et al., 2020 |
| Modified palygorskite | MB | 527.22 | Wang et al., 2015 |
| CS-g-PAM | MB | 1917 | Junlapong et al., 2020 |
| CH–Mt/PANI | MB | 111 | Minisy et al., 2021 |
| Walnut shell-based activated carbon | MB | 400.11 | Li et al., 2020 |
| PFPCS | MB | 1775.76 | Present study |
| MMT/GO/CoFe2O4 | MV | 97.26 | Foroutan et al., 2020 |
| Gum xanthan/Fe3O4 based nanocomposite hydrogel | MV | 642 | (Mittal et al., 2016) |
| Multi-carboxylic magnetic gel | MV | 400 | Song et al., 2018 |
| Graphene oxide hydrogel composite | MV | 1,052.63 | (Makhado et al., 2018) |
| Dithiocarbamate-grafted star-like polymer | MV | 1,239 | Liu et al., 2020 |
| Polyacrylamide | MV | 1,136 | Rahchamani et al., 2011 |
| PFPCS | MV | 3,756.33 | Present study |