Table 2. Descriptive statistics of relationship measures for dyads (Study 1).
Means and standard deviations by condition, sample sizes. Comparison with information reported in Przybylski and Weinstein [12].
| Phone | Notebook | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ngroups | M (SD) | M (SD) | |
| Przybylski and Weinstein [12]. Study 1 | |||
| Relationship quality | 37 | 2.78 (0.79) | |
| Partner closeness | 37 | 3.57 (1.46) | |
| Przybylski and Weinstein [12]. Study 2 | |||
| Relationship quality | 34 | 4.98 (1.09) | |
| Trust | 34 | 3.25 (1.01) | |
| Partner empathy | 34 | 4.98 (1.09) | |
| Study 1 (this paper)—Dyads only | |||
| Relationship quality | 52 | 5.26 (1.02) | 5.09 (1.02) |
| Trust (subscale) | 52 | 5.74 (0.98) | 5.76 (1.10) |
| Additional items relationship quality | 52 | 5.28 (1.18) | 5.08 (1.30) |
| Partner closeness | 52 | 3.92 (1.61) | 3.83 (1.56) |
| Partner empathy | 52 | 3.85 (0.83) | 3.94 (0.85) |
| Own empathy | 52 | 3.88 (0.83) | 3.65 (1.03) |
| Experience appreciation | 52 | 5.71 (1.23) | 5.78 (1.05) |
| Concentration | 52 | 5.99 (1.07) | 6.02 (1.01) |
Descriptive statistics for triads, and dyads and triads together are reported in the S1 Table.