Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 9;12:3494. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23555-5

Table 2.

Analysing the similarity between the R2DT diagrams and the templates.

Data source Number of nucleotides positioned exactly as in template Number of nucleotides inserted compared to template Number of nucleotides requiring repositioning Total number of displayed nucleotides Number of sequences Number of diagrams
DictyBase 9497 (83.1%) 1188 (10.4%) 746 (6.5%) 11,431 148 123
FlyBase 35,876 (92.6%) 1485 (3.8%) 184 (0.5%) 38,752 458 236
MGI 348,088 (91.6%) 19,936 (5.2%) 12,111 (3.2%) 380,135 3166 3085
PomBase 21,498 (85.9%) 2660 (10.6%) 878 (3.5%) 25,036 191 156
SGD 26,325 (89.2%) 2433 (8.2%) 746 (2.5%) 29,504 188 161
TAIR 46,925 (86.7%) 3160 (5.8%) 4,057 (7.5%) 54,142 623 483
WormBase 35,510 (91.7%) 1614 (4.2%) 1610 (4.2%) 38,734 639 376
HGNC 135,021 (94.9%) 2639 (1.9%) 4685 (3.3%) 142,345 972 869
EcoCyc 44,913 (97.%) 1036 (2.2%) 367 (0.8%) 46,316 174 174
Total 703,653 (91.8%) 36,151 (4.7%) 25,384 (3.3%) 766,395 6559 5663
RNAcentral total 9,038,893,528 (94.7%) 261,968,286 (2.7%) 241,927,491 (2.5%) 9,542,789,305 16,107,505 13,384,186

The counts indicate the number of nucleotides across all diagrams that match that class, while the percentages indicate the fraction of total displayed nucleotides.