Table 2.
Key estimates from three individual multi-level structural equation models showing associations among suicidal ideation, negative affect, positive affect, or impulsivity, and perceived warmth of others during interactions (Model Set 2).
| (A) Negative Affect | (B) Positive Affect | (C) Impulsivity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est (CI) | β | Est (CI) | β | Est (CI) | β | |
| within-person estimates | ||||||
| warmth → SI [c] | .007 [.000, .014] | .120 | .001 [−.005, .010] | .062 | −.002 [−.009, .007] | .014 |
| warmth → NA [a-NA] | −.014 [−.016, −.012] | −.402 | - | - | - | - |
| warmth → PA [a-PA] | - | - | .022 [.019, .024] | .422 | - | - |
| warmth → Imp [a-Imp] | - | - | - | - | −.198 [−.242, −.154] | −.188 |
| NA → SI [b-NA] | .466 [.324, .593] | .204 | - | - | - | - |
| PA → SI [b-PA] | - | - | −.294 [−.458, −.181] | −.230 | - | - |
| Imp → SI [b-Imp] | - | - | - | - | .006 [−.001, .013] | .068 |
| indirect Effect [βab] | −.007 [−.009, −.004] | −.006 [−.010, −.004] | −.001 [−.003, .001] | |||
| between-person estimates | ||||||
| warmth → SI | −.006 [−.028, .012] | −.057 | −.004 [−.030, .020] | −.033 | −.021 [−.046, .003] | −.146 |
| warmth → NA | −.014 [−.020, −.008] | −.326 | - | - | - | - |
| warmth → PA | - | - | .025 [.018, .033] | .474 | - | - |
| warmth → Imp | - | - | - | - | −.345 [−.599, −.090] | −.206 |
| NA → SI | 1.262 [.813, 1.664] | .472 | - | - | - | - |
| PA → SI | - | - | −1.037 [−1.489, −.591] | −.418 | - | - |
| Imp → SI | - | - | - | - | .028 [.014, .043] | .323 |
Note. N=186 (between), N=9009 (within); → indicates regression; β parameter estimates are standardized. 95% credibility intervals of unstandardized parameter estimates are in parentheses. Bolded values indicate the credibility interval does not contain zero; warmth = perceived warmth of interaction partner, NA = negative affect, PA = positive affect, Imp = impulsivity, SI = suicidal ideation.