Table 3.
Key estimates from three individual multi-level structural equation models showing associations among suicidal ideation, negative affect, positive affect, or impulsivity, and perceived dominance of others during interactions (Model Set 2).
| (A) Negative Affect | (B) Positive Affect | (C) Impulsivity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate (CI) | β | Estimate (CI) | β | Estimate (CI) | β | |
| within-person estimates | ||||||
| dominance → SI [c] | −.004 [−.011, .004] | −.034 | −.000 [−.007, .007] | .010 | .002 [−.005, .008] | .028 |
| dominance → NA [a-NA] | .009 [.007, .012] | .228 | - | - | - | - |
| dominance → PA [a-PA] | - | - | −.010 [−.013, −.007] | −.178 | - | - |
| dominance → Imp [a-Imp] | - | - | - | - | .158 [.112, .201] | .133 |
| NA → SI [b-NA] | .423 [.285, .533] | .196 | - | - | - | - |
| PA → SI [b-PA] | - | - | −.331 [−.452, −.228] | −.233 | - | - |
| Imp → SI [b-Imp] | - | - | - | - | .004 [−.003, .011] | .040 |
| indirect Effect [βab] | .004 [.002, .006] | .003 [.002, .005] | .001 [−.001, .002] | |||
| between-person estimates | ||||||
| dominance → SI | −.003 [−.020, .014] | −.031 | .005 [−.014, .026] | .043 | .002 [−.017, .023] | .019 |
| dominance → NA | .009 [.0034 .015] | .251 | - | - | - | - |
| dominance → PA | - | - | −.007 [−.014, .001] | −.138 | - | - |
| dominance → Imp | - | - | - | - | .432 [.210, .625] | .298 |
| NA → SI | 1.281 [.901, 1.669] | .513 | - | - | - | - |
| PA → SI | - | - | −1.078 [−1.48, −.665] | −.449 | - | - |
| Imp → SI | - | - | - | - | .025 [.014, .037] | .347 |
Note. N=186 (between), N=9009 (within); → indicates regression; β parameter estimates are standardized. 95% credibility intervals of unstandardized parameter estimates are in parentheses. Bolded values indicate the credibility interval does not contain zero; dominance = perceived dominance of interaction partner, NA = negative affect, PA = positive affect, Imp = impulsivity, SI = suicidal ideation.