Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 10.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2020 Dec 10;52(13):2702–2712. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720004791

Table 4.

Key estimates from multi-level structural equation models simultaneously estimating associations among suicidal ideation, negative affect and impulsivity, and perceptions of others during interactions (Model Set 3).

Negative Affect ↔ Impulsivity
(A) warmth (B) dominance
Estimate (CI) β Estimate (CI) β
within-person estimates
perception → SI [c] .005 [−.002, .013] .116 −.003 [−.011, .006] −.016
perception → NA [a-NA] −.014 [−.016, −.012] −.407 .009 [.007, .012] .230
perception → Imp [a-Imp] −.199 [−.244,−.155] −.188 .159 [.114, .204] .133
NA → SI [b-NA] .467 [.305, .660] .194 .470 [.323, .621] .199
Imp → SI [b-Imp] .000 [−.009, .007] .000 .001 [−.008, .008] −.011
NA ↔ Imp 2.640 [2.45, 2.83] .301 3.27 [3.06, 3.50] .331
between-person estimates
perception → SI −.010 [−.031, .016] −.073 −.007 [−.028, .017] −.054
perception → NA −.014 [−.020, −.007] −.316 .009 [.004, .015] .248
perception → Imp −.362 [−.606, −.101] −.219 .432 [.213, .642] .296
NA → SI 1.264 [.701, 1.809] .416 1.31 [.67, 1.97] .403
Imp → SI .007 [−.005, .022] .095 .014 [−.006, .030] .160
NA ↔ Imp 4.60 [3.19, 6.25] .494 4.50 [3.12, 6.22] .482

Note. N=186 (between), N=9009 (within); → indicates regression, ↔ indicates correlation between variables; β parameter estimates are standardized. 95% credibility intervals of unstandardized parameter estimates are in parentheses. Bolded values indicate the credibility interval does not contain zero; perception = degree to which interaction partners’ behavior is perceived to be warm / dominant, NA = negative affect, Imp = impulsivity, SI = suicidal ideation.