. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Interpers Violence. 2020 Dec 10;37(11-12):NP8941–NP8964. doi: 10.1177/0886260520976212

Table 2.

Odds of IPV and Related Circumstances Associated With High Gender-based Structural Stigma among Women in Europe.

	IPVFrom Current Partner Past-12-month		IPV From Previous Partner Past-12- month		Police Non- involvement Following the Most Serious Incident of IPV From Current Partner Past-12- month		Police Non- involvement Following the Most Serious Incident of IPV From Previous Partner Past-12- month		Worrying About IPV From Current Partner Past-12- month		Worrying About IPV From Previous Partner Past-12- month

	AOR^a 95% Cl	AOR^a 95% Cl	AOR^a 95% Cl	AOR^a 95% Cl	AOR^a 95% Cl	AOR^a 95% Cl	AOR^a 95% Cl	AOR^a 95% Cl	AOR^a 95% Cl	AOR^a 95% Cl	AOR^a 95% Cl	AOR^a 95% Cl
Model 1

Sample size	n = 16,858		n = 9,240		n = 467		n = 254		n = 26,948		n = 22,877
High gender-based structural stigma	1.18^**	1.04, 1.34	.97	.82, 1.15	.70	.41, 1.17	1.01	.77, 1.34	1.09^***	1.04, 1.15	.93^†	.86, 1.01

Note. AOR = Adjusted odds ratio.

Model 1 included the full sample and adjusted for individual-level age, sexual orientation, immigration status, relationship status, socioeconomic status, type of living area, and country-level gross domestic product.

Weighted odds ratios.

^†

p < .10.

^**

p < .01.

^***

p < .001.