Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 15;38(5):1003–1012. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02146-9

Table 3.

Studies evaluating PRP and recurrent implantation failure

Author Study design Level of evidence Intervention group (n) Endometrial thickness pre-PRP Endometrial thickness post PRP Implantation rate (%) p value Clinical pregnancy rate (%) p value
Farimani et al. (2017) [8] Case report - 1 - - - - 100 -
Mehrafza et al. (2019) [35] Retrospective cohort 3 67 - - 17.2 0.057 40.3 0.025
Coksuer et al. (2019) [5] Retrospective cohort 3 34 <7 10 (8–14) - - 50 0.042
Nazari et al. (2019) [9] RCT 2 97 - - - 0.009 44.89 0.003
Sfakianoudis et al. (2019) [36] Case report - 1 - - - - 100 -
Aghajanzadeh et al. (2020) [37] Cohort 3 30 <7 7.79±1.05 6.7 0.12 3.3 1
Zargar et al. (2021) [38] Prospective randomized 3 40 - - - - 12.5 NS