Skip to main content
. 2021 May 3;98(3):415–427. doi: 10.1007/s11524-021-00537-y

Finance

• Private sector lending is more expensive and readily available; public funding is cheaper, but often unavailable

• Public transport infrastructure takes time to develop and funding is rarely available, which adds pressure to allow parking and increase car use

Land:

• Land is cheaper in areas of low demand yet development is unviable and vice versa

Politics:

• Mayoral system offers greater powers, but success depends on the direction of travel and suffers from the usual political swings

• Prioritisation of issues is critical, but there is no clear strategy of governance towards long-term health outcomes

Policy:

• ‘Five-year land supply’ policy is meant to free up land but naturally encourages strategic holding

• Certain policies (e.g. PPG3) have been designed to improve quality of built environment, but misalignment with implementation has resulted in worse quality urban environments

Capacity:

• Significant potential for planning to affect health, but in practice this is very difficult to achieve due to lack of capacity and resource

• The private sector expect initiatives in urban health to come from the public sector, but the latter lacks resource at local level and prioritisation of longer-term issues at national level