Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 3;38(5):1133–1141. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02120-5

Table 1.

Comparison of age and semen volume, concentration, total count, progressive motility, and TPMSC among different DFI groups

DFI Number (%) Sperm DFI (%) Age (years)# Semen volume (ml)* Sperm concentration (× 106/ml) Total sperm count (× 106 ) Progressive motility (%)# TPMSC (× 106)#
< 20% 3311 (64.7) 12.3±4.1/12.3 32.8±5.4/32.0 2.8±1.2/2.8 62.6±40.5/54.0 164.8±118.8/137.6 42.3±9.9/42.2 71.2±53.8/58.9
20–30% 1003 (19.6) 24.2±2.8/23.8 34.9±6.4/33.0 2.9±1.3/2.8 60.2±43.8/51.0 165.5±131.8/133.1 35.6±10.6/35.8 63.0±56.3/49.1
≥ 30% 800 (15.6) 40.9±9.9/37.8 36.8±6.8/36.0 2.8±1.4/2.8 59.7±48.0/47.1 161.6±143.9/117.6 28.3±11.8/30.1 52.6±54.0/35.4
Total 5114 (100) 19.1±11.7/15.9 33.8±6.0/32.0 2.8±1.3/2.8 61.7±42.4/52.5 164.4±125.6/135.0 38.8±11.6/39.1 66.7±54.8/54.1
p value - - 0.000 0.023 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000

Data presented as mean ± standard deviation/median or n (%) unless otherwise noted

TPMSC: total progressive motile sperm count

#Age, progressive motility, and TPMSC were significantly different between DFI groups (p = 0.000)

*Semen volume was significantly different only between DFI < 20% and DFI ≥ 30% groups (p = 0.024)

△Total sperm count was significantly different only between DFI < 20% and DFI ≥ 30% groups (p = 0.001)

◊Sperm concentration of DFI < 20% group was significantly higher than other two groups (p = 0.008 and 0.000, respectively) while no significant difference was indicated between 20% ≤ DFI < 30% and DFI ≥ 30% groups (p = 0.639)