Table 2.
Studies | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | Q11 | Overall |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Batista et al., 2019 | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | U | Y | Good |
Eime et al., 2013a | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N | N | U | NA | U | Y | Fair |
Lee et al., 2018 | Y | Y | U | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | NA | Y | Y | Fair |
Kim et al., 2017 | Y | Y | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Good |
Harlow et al., 2018 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | NA | U | Y | Good |
Evans et al., 2017 | Y | Y | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Good |
Panza et al., 2020 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Good |
Tan et al., 2014 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | Y | Y | NA | N | Y | Fair |
List of critical assessment questions (from the JBI Critical Appraisal checklist). Q1: Is the review question clearly and explicitly stated? Q2: Were the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question? Q3: Was the search strategy appropriate? Q4: Were the sources and resources used to search for studies adequate? Q5: Were the criteria for appraising studies appropriate? Q6: Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more reviewers independently? Q7: Were there methods to minimize errors in data extraction? Q8: Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? Q9: Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? Q10: Were recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data? Q11: Were the specific directives for new research appropriate? Abbreviations: Y, Yes; N, No; U, Unclear; NA, Not applicable.