Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 23;2(2):tgab031. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgab031

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Functional connectivity of decoding communicative intentions in violinists as compared to control participants. (a) Increased connectivity for piano vs. forte excerpts in violinists vs. control participants. (b) Increased connectivity for temporally cropped vs. unmodified sequences in violinists vs. control participants. (c) Increased connectivity for spatially shuffled vs. unmodified sequences for violinists vs. control participants. [aITG: inferior temporal gyrus, anterior part; aMTG: medial temporal gyrus, anterior part; aSTG: superior temporal gyrus, anterior part; aTFus: temporal fusiform, anterior part; Cereb: cerebellum lobule; DLPFC: dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; FO: frontal operculum; FP: frontal pole; IFG oper: inferior frontal gyrus operculum; INS: insula; IPL: inferior parietal lobule; IPS: inferior parietal sulcus; LG: lingual gyrus; MFC: medial frontal cortex; MTG: medial temporal gyrus; PFC: prefrontal cortex; pITG: inferior temporal gyrus, posterior part; pMTG: medial temporal gyrus, posterior part; Post Cing: posterior cingulate; PostCG: posterior central gyrus; pSMG: superior medial gyrus, posterior part; pTFusC: temporal fusiform cortex, posterior part; R: right; SMG: superior medial gyrus; SPL: superior parietal lobule; SubCalC: subcallosal cortex; toITG: inferior temporal gyrus temporo-occipital part; toMTG: medial temporal gyrus, temporo-occipital part; Ver: vermis]. Seed-level P < 0.05 FDR corrected.