Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 3;7(3):mgen000531. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000531

Table 3.

Performance metrics for the different bioinformatics assays for the blast+-, KMA- and SRST2-based detection methods

Bioinformatics assay

Reference standard

Detection method

TP

FN

TN

FP

Accuracy (%)

Precision (%)

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

Repeatability (%)

Reproducibility (%)

AMR prediction

Database

blast+

80

3

196

4

97.53

95.24

96.39

98.00

100.00

100.00

KMA

79

4

196

4

97.17

95.18

95.18

98.00

100.00

100.00

SRST2

80

3

196

4

97.53

95.24

96.39

98.00

100.00

100.00

Virulence gene detection

stx genes

Database

blast+

138

3

121

0

98.85

100.00

97.87

100.00

100.00

100.00

KMA

141

0

120

1*

99.62

99.30

100.00

99.17

100.00

100.00

SRST2

141

0

120

1*

99.62

99.30

100.00

99.17

100.00

100.00

Other genes

Database

blast+

883

20

718

0

98.77

100.00

97.79

100.00

100.00

100.00

KMA

903

0

717

1

99.94

99.89

100.00

99.86

100.00

100.00

SRST2

902

1

718

0

99.94

100.00

99.89

100.00

100.00

100.00

Serotype determination

Database

blast+

103

3

10

0

97.41

100.00

97.17

100.00

100.00

100.00

KMA

104

2

10

0

98.28

100.00

98.11

100.00

100.00

100.00

SRST2

104

2

10

0

98.28

100.00

98.11

100.00

100.00

100.00

Plasmid replicon detection

Tool

blast+

333

(333)†

0

(15)†

12 505

(12 490)†

0

(0)†

100.00 (99.88)†

100.00

(100.00)†

100.00

(95.69)†

100.00

(100.00)†

100.00

100.00

KMA

292

(299)†

41

(49)†

12 496

(12 490)†

9

(0)†

99.61

(99.62)†

97.01

(100.00)†

87.69

(85.92)†

99.93

(100.00)†

100.00

100.00

SRST2

319

(334)†

14

(14)†

12 490

(12 490)†

15

(0)†

99.77

(99.89)†

95.51

(100.00)†

95.80

(95.98†)

99.88

(100.00)†

100.00

100.00

Sequence typing (cgMLST)

Tool

blast+

328 329

874

24 595

535

99.60

99.84

99.73

97.87

100.00

100.00

KMA

327 387

1816

24 595

535

99.34

99.84

99.45

97.87

100.00

100.00

SRST2‡

*Probably caused by low-level within-species contamination of sample EH2038.

†Updated results when FP results that could be traced back to algorithmic issues with blast+ are considered as TP.

‡cgMLST using SRST2 could not be evaluated due to the long running times.

TP, true positive; FP, false positive; FN, false negative;TN, true negative.