Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 8;115(12):2280–2292. doi: 10.1111/add.15042

Table 4.

Mixed‐effect regression model, logged estimates and estimates expressed in terms of percentage change (95% CI) for rate of wine consumption a (n = 166).

Estimate (SE) t‐value P‐value 95% CI for estimate
Lower Upper Percentage change (95% CIs)
Intercept 2.15 (0.16) 13.7 < 0.001 1.85 2.46
Bottle size 75 cl (ref: 50 cl) −0.06 (0.03) * −2.1 0.040 −0.12 −0.00 −5.8% (−10.9 to −0.4%)
Intervention period (ref: period 1) 0.01 (0.03) 0.4 0.691 −0.04 0.07 1.1% (−4.3 to 6.8%)
Intervention order (ref: 50 cl first) −0.02 (0.05) −0.5 0.646 −0.11 0.07 −2.2% (−10.7 to 7.2%)
Baseline consumption (litres) −0.41 (0.04) ** −10.2 < 0.001 −0.48 −0.33 −33.4% (−38.3 to −28.1%)
Guest consumption (litres) −0.14 (0.03) ** −4.9 < 0.001 −0.19 −0.08 −13.0% (−17.7 to −8.0%)
Out‐of‐home consumption (litres) 0.01 (0.02) 0.5 0.622 −0.03 0.05 0.9% (−2.7 to 4.7%)
Non‐study wine consumption at home (litres) 0.004 (0.026) −0.01 0.889 −0.05 0.05 −0.4% (−5.3 to 4.8%)
Price (£) per litre 0.02 (0.01) 1.7 0.089 −0.00 0.05 2.3% (−0.3 to 4.9%)
‘Usual behaviour’ duration (days) 0.01 (0.004) * 4.0 < 0.001 0.01 0.02 1.4% (0.7 to 2.1%)
Number of wine drinkers in household −0.02 (0.04) −0.5 0.650 −0.09 0.05 −1.6% (−8.2 to 5.5%)
*

Significant at the P < 0.05 level;

**

significant at the P < 0.01 level.

a

Percentage change was estimated by exponentiating the logged estimates, then subtracting these values from 1. CI = confidence interval; SE = standard error.