Skip to main content
. 2021 May 27;12:677701. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.677701

Table 2.

Semen Characteristics of Patients with COVID-19.

First author [reference number] Sample size (n) Age, median (min-max), years Disease Stage/severity (n) Mean days until semen sample collection (d, min-max) Fever (n, %) Leukocytes detected in semen (n) Oligospermia (n) Low sperm motility Abnormal sperm morphology (n) SARS-CoV−2 positive in semen sample (n,%)
Li D (3) 38 NA     NA NA NA NA NA 6 (15.8)
  Recovered 23 2.5 (2-3) 2/23
  Acute 15 7.3 (2-13) 4/15
Paoli D (13) 1 31 Mild 1 8 1 (100) NA NA NA NA 0
Kayaaslan B (14) 16 33.5 (18-54) Acute 6 (37.5) NA NA NA NA 0
    Mild 11 1 (0-7)
    Moderate 5 1 (0-7)
Holtmann N (15) 18 Recovered 32.7 [8–54]b 10 (55.6) 14 0
42.7 ± 10.4a Mild 14 34.9 ± 11.7a
40.8 ± 8.7a Moderate 4 25.5 ± 8.3a c c NA
Song C (16) 12 33 (22-38) Recovered   12 29.8 (14-42) 8 (66.7) NA NA NA NA 0
Pan F (17) 34 37 (18-57) Recovered 34 31 [29–36]b NA NA NA NA NA 0
Ma L (18) 12 31 (25-46) Recovered 78.5 (56-109) NA 1 5 2 0
    Mild 1
    Moderate 11
Temiz MZ (19) 20 37.2 (20-60) Acute 20 9.5 (2-10) 10 (50) 7 e e d 0
Rawlings SA (20) 6 38 (28-45) Acute   6 12 (6-17) 6 (100) NA NA NA NA 0
Pavone C (21) 9 41.1 (31-60) 9 42.2 (7-88) 4 (44.4) NA NA NA NA 0
Acute 2 10 (7-13)
Recovered 7 51.4 (34-88)
Ning J (22) 17 35 (23-46)     17 27 (12-64) NA NA NA NA NA 0
  38 (23-46) Acute 9 30 (14-64)
  30 (28-45) Recovered 8 18.5 (12-36)
Guo L (23) 23 41 (20-62) 23 32 (27.5-33) 7 (30.4) NA 1 2 0 0
Acute 12 31 (26-34)
Recovered 11 31 (26-34)
Li H (24) 23 40.8 (27-53) Recovered   25.8 (4-42) 8 (34.8) 14d 9d NA NA 0
    Mild 9 40.8 ± 7.2a
    Moderate 14 40.9 ± 9.6a
Özveri, H (25) 1 49 Acute 1 25 NA NA NA NA NA 0
Ruan Y (37) 70f 31 (21-49) Recovered   74 80 (64-93) 56 (80) NA d d e 0
  Mild 11
  Moderate 31
  Severe 32

aReported as standard deviation. bReported as Interquartile range (IQR). cPatients with a moderate infection have a statistically significant impairment of sperm quality (sperm concentration, total number of sperm per ejaculate, total number of progressive motility, total number of complete motility) compared with men recovered from a mild infection and the healthy control group. dThere was a significant difference between the observation group and the healthy control group. eThere was no significant difference between the patients and the healthy control group. fOnly 70 semen samples were obtained from 74 patients. NA, Not applicable.