Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 10;9:69. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00421-9

Table 2.

Markers of care and unadjusted association with ED thoughts and behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 73)

Overall
(N = 73)
N (%)
Intrusive ED Thoughts ED Behaviorsa
n (%) p-value n (%) p-value
Increased
(n = 59)
No change/
decreased
(n = 14)
Frequently
or daily
(n = 33)
Rarely
or Never
(n = 40)
Access
Accessed via telehealth 64 (88%) 53 (90%) 11 (79%) 0.36 29 (88%) 35 (88%) 0.99
Accessed in-person 16 (22%) 13 (22%) 3 (21%) 0.99 7 (21%) 9 (23%) 0.89
No access 6 (8%) 3 (5%) 3 (21%) 0.08 3 (9%) 3 (8%) 0.99
Any access to care 0.08 0.99
 Yes (telehealth and/or in-person) 67 (92%) 56 (95%) 11 (79%) 30 (91%) 37 (92%)
 No 6 (8%) 3 (5%) 3 (21%) 3 (9%) 3 (8%)
Change in therapy
Outpatient therapy 0.49 0.66
  No change 57 (78%) 47 (80%) 10 (71%) 25 (76%) 32 (80%)
  Stopped during pandemic 16 (22%) 12 (20%) 4 (29%) 8 (24%) 8 (20%)
Outpatient nutrition 0.99 0.99
  No change 66 (90%) 53 (90%) 13 (93%) 30 (91%) 36 (90%)
  Stopped during pandemic 7 (10%) 6 (10%) 1 (7%) 3 (9%) 4 (10%)
Weight checks by medical provider 0.12 0.22
  No change 50 (68%) 43 (73%) 7 (50%) 25 (76%) 25 (63%)
  Stopped during to pandemic 23 (32%) 16 (27%) 7 (50%) 8 (24%) 15 (38%)
Stopped any treatment 0.38 0.44
  Yes 34 (47%) 26 (44%) 8 (57%) 16 (48%) 23 (58%)
  No 39 (53%) 33 (56%) 6 (43%) 17 (52%) 17 (42%)
Disruption
Perceived disruption to care 0.36 0.56
  Yes 24 (32%) 21 (36%) 3 (21%) 12 (36%) 12 (30%)
  No 49 (67%) 38 (64%) 11 (79%) 21 (64%) 28 (70%)
Quality
Quality of treatment in past 3 months 0.01 0.51
  Better than usual 6 (8%) 2 (3%) 4 (31%) 1 (3%) 5 (13%)
  As good as usual 42 (59%) 34 (59%) 8 (62%) 19 (59%) 23 (59%)
  Somewhat worse than usual 21 (30%) 20 (34%) 1 (8%) 11 (34%) 10 (26%)
  Much worse than usual 2 (3%) 2 (3%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%)

† not mutually exclusive – n = 13 reported access both via telehealth and in-person

a Composite measure for engaging in restrictive or compensatory behaviors or binging on food in the past 3 months