Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 10.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Sci Technol. 2020 May 12;54(11):6800–6811. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05007

Table 2.

PFBS, PFHpA, PFOA, PFOS, and PFDA Trophic Magnification Factors (TMFs) for Consumers in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River of North Carolina and South Carolina, US

species na PFBS PFHpA PFOA PFOS PFDA
all consumers 130 1.08 0.75 0.81 0.93 0.83
mollusks 18 1.30 1.00 1.19 0.49 1.00
aquatic insects 21 1.15 0.88 0.96 0.52 0.99
crayfishes 4 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00
fishes 85 1.08 0.87 0.89 1.04 0.96
American eel 8 2.27 0.46 1.00 0.41 1.00
blue catfish 10 1.02 1.00 1.00 0.53 1.00
bluegill 10 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.12 1.11
channel catfish 10 1.13 0.70 0.74 1.07 1.00
common carp 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.30 1.00
largemouth bass 10 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.68 1.00
notchlip redhorse 6 0.57 0.29 0.20 0.48 0.17
shorthead redhorse 11 1.25 1.18 1.00 1.19 0.82
smallmouth buffalo 7 2.33 0.92 1.00 1.70 1.00
whitefin shinerb 3 1.00 1.95 1.00 1.67 1.83
a

n = number of samples analyzed.

b

On the basis of whole-body concentrations.