Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun;173:306–330. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.03.018

Table 3.

Summary of main advantages, limitations, and applications of cell culture strategies for nanomedicine in vitro evaluation.

Strategy Main advantages Main limitations Highlighted applications Examples with nanomedicine
Monolayer cell culture Inexpensive Cell-line derived: clonal selection Initial nanomedicine biological characterization. [67]
Co-culture Representation of different TME populations Condition optimization for the growth of different cell lines Cell type-targeted therapies [69], [95]
Spheroid Representation of:
Cell-cell interactions
Cell-matrix interactions
In vivo-like gradients (over 400 µm diameter)
Do not require highly specialized techniques
Cell line-derived: clonal selection
Higher costs than monolayer culture
Tumor penetration studies [75], [94], [95]
Organoid Patient-derived
Maintenance of intra- and inter- tumor heterogeneity
High costs
Complex establishment and maintenance compared to cell line-derived cultures
Patient-tailored therapies [87]
Tumor-on-chip Supports microfluidics High complexity
Specific expertise and materials required
High-throughput screening [98]
Bioprinting High spatial control Specific expertise and materials required Tissue and organ fabrication when patterning and precisely biologics placing is required [103], [104]

Tumor microenvironment: TME