Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 8;7(7):e707. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001154

TABLE 2.

Baseline characteristics and comparative analysis of liver transplant recipients with HIV+/HCV+ coinfection in the United States in the pre-DAA era (2008–2012)

Pre-DAA (2008–2012) (N = 24 238)
HIV+/HCV+a (n =68) HIV+/HCV (n = 49) HIV/HCV+ (n = 10 451) HIV/HCV (n = 13 670)
Donor
 Age (y) 40.5 (24.5–51.5) 45.0 (31.0–53.0) 42.0 (27.0–52.0) 43.0 (27.0–56.0)
 BMI (kg/m2) 25.7 (22.2–30.9) 25.9 (24.2–30.0) 26.4 (23.2–30.5) 26.3 (23.1–30.3)
 Male gender 40 (58.8) 23 (46.9) 6248 (59.8) 7987 (58.4)
 Caucasian race 38 (55.9) 26 (53.1) 6871 (65.7) 9084 (66.5)
 Diabetes 8 (11.8) 4 (8.2) 1116 (10.7) 1558 (11.4)
 DCD 4 (5.9) 0 (0) 570 (5.5) 624 (4.6)
 Cold ischemic time (h) 6.0 (5.1–7.3) 7.2 (5.0–8.6)* 6.0 (4.7, 8.0) 6.1 (4.7–8.0)
 DRIb 1.71 (1.57–1.91) 1.80 (1.59–2.01) 1.71 (1.53–1.98) 1.75 (1.55–2.10)
Recipient
 Age (y) 54.0 (49.5–57.0) 51.0 (46.0–57.0) 56.0 (52.0–60.0)*** 56.0 (48.0–62.0)*
 Male gender 52 (76.5) 41 (83.7) 7790 (74.5) 8333 (61.0)**
 Caucasian race 42 (61.8) 33 (67.3) 7166 (68.6) 10 004 (73.2)*
 BMI (kg/m2) 26.6 (23.4–30.0) 24.1 (23.2–26.5) 27.9 (24.7–31.7)** 27.6 (24.1–32.3)*
 Posttransplant LOS (d) 9.0 (7.0–13.0) 11.0 (7.0–16.5) 9.0 (7.0–16.0) 10.0 (7.0–17.0)
 Waiting list time (d) 99.0 (37.5–256.5) 70.0 (7.0–274.0) 110.0 (29.0, 298.0) 69.0 (13.0–235.0)
 Diabetes 12 (17.7) 11 (22.4) 2361 (22.6) 3733 (27.3)
 MELD score 18.0 (12.0–24.0) 24.0 (13.0–34.0)* 18.0 (12.0–26.0) 22.0 (15.0–30.0)**
 Life support requirement 1 (1.5) 5 (10.2)* 488 (4.7) 1159 (8.5)*
 ICU 4 (5.9) 7 (14.3) 811 (7.8) 1895 (13.9)
Dialysis requirement 2 (2.9) 6 (12.2)* 981 (9.4) 1772 (13.0)*
Ascites (mild or worse) 51 (75.0) 30 (61.2) 7804 (74.7) 10 473 (76.6)
 Hepatic encephalopathy (grade 1 or worse) 40 (58.8) 27 (55.1) 6306 (60.3) 8778 (64.2)
 PVT 6 (8.8) 8 (16.3) 979 (9.4) 4014 (13.8)
 HCC 29 (42.6) 18 (36.7) 4811 (46.0) 2697 (19.7)***

aHIV+/HCV+ group in pre-DAA era are compared with all other groups through pairwise comparisons of P value from chi-squared test for categorical variables and 2-sample Wilcoxon rank test for continuous variables (all continuous variables failed the Shapiro–Wilk normality test). All data were completely apart from the following missing data: donor variables = DCD, n = 783; diabetes, n = 890; cold ischemic time, n = 362; BMI, n = 50. Recipient variables = diabetes, n = 262; BMI, n = 8; length of stay, n = 323; days on waitlist, n = 5; portal vein thrombosis, n = 147; hepatic encephalopathy, n = 5; dialysis, n = 47; ascites, n = 5. Missing values of continuous variables were ignored, while those of categorical variables were assumed to be negative.

bCalculated by the DRI formula provided by Feng et al.24

Values are n (%) or median (interquartile range).

Significance codes: ***P < 0.001; **0.001 < P ≤ 0.01; *0.01 < P ≤ 0.05 (all other P > 0.05).

BMI, body mass index; DAA, direct-acting antiviral; DCD, donation after circulatory death; DRI, donor risk index; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C virus; ICU, intensive care unit; LOS, length of stay; MELD, Model For End-Stage Liver Disease; NAT, nucleic acid test; PVT, portal vein thrombosis.