. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0252980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252980

Table 2. Hierarchical fixed effects regression analyses.

	Team members’ performance evaluations						Qualified observers’ performance evaluations
	b	SE	t	p	R²	ΔR²	b	SE	t	p	R²	ΔR²
Step 1					.113						.176
Task competence	.015	.004	3.95	< .001			.035	.007	5.10	< .001
Step 2					.515	.402					.692	.516
Task competence	.008	.003	2.83	.005			.021	.004	4.76	< .001
Speaking time	.024	.004	6.69	< .001			.055	.005	10.00	< .001
Physical expressiveness	.104	.038	2.72	.007			.187	.058	3.21	.002
Step 3					.530	.015					.737	.045
Task competence	.007	.003	2.24	.027			.141	.004	3.26	.001
Speaking time	.024	.004	6.90	< .001			.055	.005	10.79	< .001
Physical expressiveness	.083	.039	2.11	.037			.079	.059	1.34	.181
Likability ^a	.098	.051	1.93	.056			.350	.077	4.53	< .001

^a Team members’ perceived likability in predicting team members’ performance evaluations; qualified observers’ perceived likability in predicting qualified observers’ performance evaluations.