Q8. Have there been any delays in getting routine bone imaging such as CT due to COVID19? What is the average length of the delay?
-
•
≤2 weeks: 3 out of 25 responses − 12%
-
•
2–4 weeks: 11 out of 25 responses − 44%
-
•
4–8 weeks: 7 out of 25 responses − 28%
-
•
More than 8 weeks: 1 out of 25 responses − 4%
-
•
Not specified: 3 out of 25 responses − 12%
|
Q11. Have there been any delays in getting bone scans due to COVID19? what is the average length of the delay?
-
•
≤2 weeks: 2 out of 19 responses – 10.5%
-
•
2–4 weeks: 8 out of 19 responses – 42.1%
-
•
4–8 weeks: 5 out of 19 responses – 26.3%
-
•
More than 8 weeks: 2 out of 19 responses − 10.5%
-
•
Not specified: 2 out of 19 responses − 10.5%
|
Q12. Have there been any delays in getting MRI scans due to COVID19? what is the average length of the delay?
-
•
≤2 weeks: 2 out of 22 responses – 9%
-
•
2–4 weeks: 8 out of 22 responses – 36.3%
-
•
4–8 weeks: 6 out of 22 responses – 27.3%
-
•
More than 8 weeks: 1 out of 22 responses – 4.5%
-
•
Not specified: 5 out of 22 responses – 22.7%
|
Q13. Has there been an impact on palliative external beam radiotherapy at your centre due to COVID19? What is an average length of the delay?
-
•
≤2 weeks: 5 out of 11 responses – 45.4%
-
•
2–4 weeks: 2 out of 11 responses – 18.2%
-
•
4–8 weeks: 0 out of 11 responses – 0%
-
•
More than 8 weeks: 1 out of 11 responses – 9%
-
•
Not specified: 3 out of 11 responses – 27.3%
|
Q14. Has there been an impact upon access to stereotactic radiotherapy at your centre due to COVID19? What is an average length of the delay?
-
•
≤2 weeks: 1 out of 8 responses – 12.5%
-
•
2–4 weeks: 2 out of 8 responses – 25%
-
•
4–8 weeks: 1 out of 8 responses – 12.5%
-
•
More than 8 weeks: 2 out of 8 responses – 25%
-
•
Not specified: 2 out of 8 responses – 25%
|
Q16. What percentage of your patients with bone metastases have been having remote follow-up?
-
•
0–10%: 6 out of 29 responses: 20.7%
-
•
11–30%: 2 out of 29 responses: 6.9%
-
•
31–50%: 4 out of 29 responses: 13.8%
-
•
51–80%: 6 out of 29 responses: 20.7%
-
•
81–100%: 9 out of 29 responses: 31%
-
•
Not specified: 2 out of 29 responses: 6.9%
|
Q41. Have bone directed clinical trials been affected at your institution during COVID19?
-
•
Many temporarily interrupted.
-
•
Recruitment halted.
-
•
Difficult to start or plan new trials
-
•
Some trials concluding with reduced recruitment
-
•
Issues with patient sampling
-
•
Issues with data capture
|
Q42. Have bone oriented or cancer-oriented labs been affected at your institution during COVID19?
-
•
Most labs were closed during lockdown (March to June).
-
•
Ongoing restrictions and reduced capacity after reopening
-
•
Animal experiments especially affected
-
•
Longer timescale experiments almost impossible
-
•
Substantial staffing issues
-
•
Funding issues in terms of grant extensions
|
Q43. Have the trainees in the cancer and bone field experienced significant changes to their learning opportunities during COVID19?
-
•
Mostly remote learning and interaction, no face-to-face meetings.
-
•
Inability to perform experiments in the labs and delays in completion of doctoral projects.
-
•
Less clinic exposure and face-to-face consultations. More telephone/virtual clinics.
-
•
Trainee redeployment to covid areas.
|
Q44. Have there been financial constraints to cancer and bone research funding during COVID19?What steps are you or your institution taking to compensate for any lapse in training or research projects?
|