Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 27;32(7):1249–1275. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05742-0

Table 4.

Delphi round 1 responses

Component Inclusion of standard on this component Consensus (% rating as extremely or very important, i.e., ≥ 75%)
Extremely important Very important Somewhat important Not so important Not at all important
Identification
Fragility fracture 22 3 0 0 0 Yes (100%)
Risk factors for osteoporosis 12 10 2 0 0 Yes (92%)
Medicines associated with bone loss/fracture risk 7 15 3 0 0 Yes (88%)
Medical conditions associated with bone loss/fracture risk 5 16 4 0 0 Yes (84%)
Investigation
Biochemistry 5 11 8 1 0 No
BMD testing 8 9 8 0 0 No
Risk assessment tools 12 9 3 1 0 Yes (84%)
Vertebral fracture assessment 14 5 4 1 0 Yes (79%)
Falls risk assessment 9 13 3 0 0 Yes (88%)
Specialist referral 4 11 8 2 0 No
Information for patients 14 7 4 0 0 Yes (84%)
Intervention
Indications—see Table 5 N/A
Pharmacological 10 12 3 0 0 Yes (88%)
Non-pharmacological 4 16 4 1 0 Yes (80%)
Side effects 6 15 3 1 0 Yes (84%)
Monitoring effect 11 11 3 0 0 Yes (88%)
Duration 13 8 4 0 0 Yes (84%)
Adherence 8 12 3 2 0 Yes (80%)
Falls programs 5 13 6 0 0 No
Integration
Long-term management plans 11 9 4 1 0 Yes (80%)
Quality
Adherence to guideline-based care 10 12 2 1 0 Yes (88%)

Respondents’ priority ratings for each of the key components identified in existing clinical practice guidelines. Consensus was defined as a rating of extremely important or very important by at least 75% of respondents