Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 12;121(7):1859–1869. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04656-x

Table 4.

Stepwise multivariate regression analyses of the results of the vascular evaluation with the SBP/MET slope, the SBP/W slope and the peak SBP/W ratio as continuous dependent variable for male and female athletes

Male athletes Female athletes
R2 F p value R2 F p value
SBP/MET slope 0.161 F(8, 38) = 2.101 0.060 − 0.214 F(8, 15) = 0.493 0.843
SBP/W slope 0.139 F(8, 38) = 1.928 0.084 0.130 F(8, 16) = 0.656 0.722
Peak SBP/W ratio 0.170 F(10, 36) = 1.942 0.071 − 0.114 F(10, 14) = 0.754 0.668

Predictors of the model were brachial systolic BP, brachial diastolic BP, central systolic and diastolic BP, mean central BP, central pulse pressure, PWV, Aix@75 bpm, R and total vascular resistance