Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 16;42(5):1133–1140. doi: 10.1007/s00246-021-02591-4

Table 2.

Clinical characteristics of the two groups

Clinical features Physically active subjects' group (n = 53) Sedentary subject' group (n = 37) p-value
Age at diagnosis, years 4.8 ± 4.7 3.2 ± 3.7 0.088
Age at study enrolment, years 13.2 ± 2.5 9.3 ± 3.0  < 0.001*
Body surface area, m2 1.6 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.3  < 0.001*
BAV morphology 0.970
Type 0 4 (7.5) 3 (8.1) 0.922
Type 1 44 (83) 30 (81.1) 0.813
Subtype R-L 31 (58.5) 21 (56.7) 0.966
Subtype R-NC 13 (24.5) 9 (24.3) 0.966
Type 2 5 (9.4) 4 (10.8) 0.830
Aortic regurgitation 28 (52.8) 19 (51.3) 0.890
Mild 24 (45.3) 11 (29.7) 0.136
Moderate 3 (5.7) 5 (13.5) 0.198
Severe 1 (1.9) 3 (8.1) 0.159

Sinuses of Valsalva diameter

mm

27.2 ± 4.3 23.8 ± 3.9  < 0.001*
z score, median (IQR) 0.7 (1.9) 0.4 (1.6) 0.253

Sinuses of Valsalva dilation,

mild (≥ 2 and ≤ 4 z score)

severe (> 4 z score )

8 (15.1) 5 (13.5) 0.834
8 (15.1) 4 (10.8) 0.556
0 (0) 1 (2.7) 0.229

Ascending aorta diameter

mm

28.3 ± 5.1 25.6 ± 4.4 0.009*
z score, median (IQR) 2.4 (2.5) 2.8 (2.6) 0.633

Ascending aorta dilation,

mild (≥ 2 and ≤ 4 z score )

severe (> 4 z score )

33 (62.3) 21 (56.7) 0.600
20 (37.7) 16 (43.2) 0.600
13 (24.5) 5 (13.5) 0.199
Sinus of Valsalva diameter progression > 10 mm 7 (13.2) 3 (8.1) 0.449
Ascending aorta diameter progression > 10 mm 5 (9.4) 5 (13.5) 0.545

Data are presented in mean ± SD or n (%), unless otherwise indicated

BAV bicuspid aortic valve

*p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant