Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Neurol. 2021 Apr 26;342:113724. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2021.113724

Table 2.

Intrinsic properties of CCKBCs in sham control and IHK mice

Animal group Sham (n=12) IHK (Ipsilateral; n=13) IHK (Contralateral; n=8) Significant differences One-way ANOVA
RMP (mV) −60.0 ± 1.0 −64.2 ± 1.2* −62.6 ± 1.1 p < 0.05
Rinput (MΩ) 189.4 ± 15.0 189.6 ± 15.6 197.6 ± 28.9 ns
τmembrane (ms) 17.6 ± 1.6 21.1 ± 1.9 16.9 ± 1.4 ns
Sag amplitude (mV) 8.8 ± 1.0 8.2 ± 1.1 7.9 ± 1.1 ns
AP threshold (mV) −37.7 ± 1.4 −41.1 ± 1.1 −39.0 ± 1.1 ns
AP amplitude (mV) 61.7 ± 2.7 68.1 ± 2.2 59.3 ± 3.5 ns
AP half-width (ms) 0.71 ± 0.03 0.66 ± 0.03 0.69 ± 0.03 ns
AP frequency (Hz) 43.8 ± 3.1 38.8 ± 2.9 45.0 ± 3.8 ns

See the methods section for descriptions of each of the measured intrinsic properties. The n values represent number of CCKBCs. AP frequency was measured from APs evoked by 1 s depolarizing current steps (300 pA). Abbreviations: RMP, resting membrane potential; Rinput, input resistance; τmembrane, membrane time constant; ns, not significant.

*,

significantly different vs sham controls (post hoc Tukey test).