Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 5;397(10290):2182–2193. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00731-5

Table 1.

Ovarian and tubal cancers grouped by primary site and screening status

Total Screen positives Cancers not detected by screening
Screen negatives ≤1 year from last test of screening episode Screen negatives >1 year after last test of screening episode Never attended screening Diagnosed >1 year after end of screening*
Multimodal screening (50 625 women, 789 129 women-years)
Ovarian and tubal cancer 522 (100%) 212 (41%) 41 (8%) 41 (8%) 3 (1%) 225 (43%)
Non-epithelial ovarian cancer 16 (100%) 7 (44%) 2 (13%) 2 (13%) 0 5 (31%)
Borderline epithelial ovarian cancer 54 (100%) 24 (44%) 10 (19%) 5 (9%) 0 15 (28%)
Invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer 452 (100%) 181 (40%) 29 (6%) 34 (8%) 3 (1%) 205 (45%)
Ultrasound screening (50 623 women, 790 231 women-years)
Ovarian and tubal cancer 517 (100%) 164 (32%) 63 (12%) 50 (10%) 19 (4%) 221 (43%)
Non-epithelial ovarian cancer 13 (100%) 11 (85%) 0 1 (8%) 0 1 (8%)
Borderline epithelial ovarian cancer 59 (100%) 48 (81%) 2 (3%) 1 (2%) 3 (5%) 5 (8%)
Invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer 445 (100%) 105 (24%) 61 (14%) 48 (11%) 16 (4%) 215 (48%)
No screening (101 314 women, 1 577 517 women-years)
Ovarian and tubal cancer 1016 (100%) .. .. 514 (51%) .. 499 (49%)
Non-epithelial ovarian cancer 17 (100%) .. .. 7 (41%) .. 10 (59%)
Borderline epithelial ovarian cancer 91 (100%) .. .. 50 (55%) .. 41 (45%)
Invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer 905 (100%) .. .. 457 (50%) .. 448 (50%)

Data are n (%).

*

Screening end Dec 31, 2011.

Includes one case in which histology was not available and two cases of neoplasm of uncertain or unknown behaviour.