Table 3.
Summary of analyses of relative reduction of ovarian and tubal cancer deaths
Number of women (n) | Deaths (n) | Maximum χ2 or mortality reduction (hazard ratio) | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary analysis*(ovarian and tubal cancer deaths) | ||||
MMS | 50 625 | 296 | 0·41 | 0·58 |
USS | 50 622 | 291 | 1·23 | 0·36 |
No screening | 101 314 | 619 | .. | .. |
Subgroup outcome analysis*(invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer) | ||||
MMS | 50 625 | 295 | 0·41 | 0·60 |
USS | 50 622 | 287 | 1·37 | 0·33 |
No screening | 101 314 | 617 | .. | .. |
Secondary analysis†(all data 2001–20) | ||||
MMS | 50 625 | 296 | 0·96 (0·83 to 1·10; 0·068) | 0·52 |
USS | 50 622 | 291 | 0·94 (0·82 to 1·08; 0·067) | 0·37 |
No screening | 101 314 | 619 | .. | .. |
Secondary analysis†(only data 2015–20) | ||||
MMS | 45 999 | 136 | 1·05 (0·86 to 1·30; 0·112) | 0·63 |
USS | 46 079 | 128 | 0·99 (0·80 to 1·22; 0·107) | 0·91 |
No screening | 91 808 | 258 | .. | .. |
Data are maximum χ2 for primary and subgroup analyses or mortality reduction (95% CI; SE) for secondary analyses. MMS=multimodal screening. USS=ultrasound screening.
Versatile test.
Cox model.