TABLE 3.

Joint music-making behavior before and during lockdown: physically present.

3a.	Playing occurrence
	Yes	No
Before	234 (100%)	0 (0%)
During	49 (21%)	185 (79%)
	Playing frequency
	>Once a week	Once a week	Once every 2 weeks	Once a month	<Once a month
Before	138 (59%)	73 (31%)	8 (3%)	9 (4%)	6 (3%)
During	14 (6%)	15 (6%)	6 (3%)	1 (<1%)	13 (6%)
3b.	Interaction effects of playing occurrence and frequency before lockdown
		Playing occurrence		Playing frequency
Variables		Using Wilcoxon (W)		Using Kruskal-Wallis (H)
Household type		–		8.738 (p = 0.120)
Employment situation		–		7.56 (p = 0.056)
Music as main income		–		5.084 (p = 0.038)*
		–		Using Spearman (rs)
Technical competence				−0.032 (p = 0.628)
Social competence		–		−0.147 (p = 0.024)*
3c.	Interaction effects of playing occurrence and frequency during lockdown
		Playing occurrence		Playing frequency
Variables		Using Wilcoxon (W)		Using Kruskal-Wallis (H)
Household type		4425 (p = 0.792)		5.883 (p = 0.208)
Employment situation		4835 (p = 0.444)		1.442 (p = 0.696)
Music as main income		4462.5 (p = 0.809)		0.948 (p = 0.330)
				Using Spearman (rs)
Technical competence		4665.5 (p = 0.748)		−0.036 (p = 0.804)
Social competence		4748 (p = 0.600)		−0.141 (p = 0.332)

(3a) Playing occurrence indicates whether respondents played music with others (Yes) or not (No) before and during lockdown. Playing frequency indicates how often respondents played. (3b and 3c) Summarized results of Wilcoxon rank sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests on variables with possible influence on musical behavior are provided, as well as results of Spearman corrleation tests on self-assessed technical and social competence (*significant effect). Playing occurrence before lockdown was 100%, so no comparison could be made here between those who did and did not play with others.