Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 6;28(5):491–505. doi: 10.5551/jat.57752

Table 3. Results of the multivariate Cox analyses for the risk factors associated with disease progression (i.e., a ≥ 30% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline or end-stage renal disease) according to age-based sub-cohort (age <65 years and age ≥ 65 years).

Variables Multivariate Analysis (Total) Multivariate Analysis (Age < 65 years) Multivariate Analysis (Age ≥ 65 years)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P -Value >Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P -Value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P -Value
Model 1 for Max IMT ( n = 112) ( n = 64) ( n = 48)
Age (1 year increase) 0.99 (0.96–1.03) 0.7602 0.92 (0.84–1.01) 0.0905 1.06 (0.95–1.18) 0.2998
Men (vs. women) 0.74 (0.35–1.56) 0.4225 0.35 (0.11–1.06) 0.0630 1.47 (0.44–4.86) 0.5252
eGFR (10 mL/min/1.73 m 2 increase) 0.65 (0.54–0.79) <0.0001 0.60 (0.44–0.79) 0.0002 0.72 (0.55–0.94) 0.0176
UACR (10 mg/g Cre increase) 1.01 (1.01–1.01) 0.0004 1.02 (1.01–1.03) 0.0058 1.01 (1.00–1.02) 0.0030
Max IMT (1 mm increase) 1.47 (1.02–2.08) 0.0393 2.52 (1.48–4.22) 0.0011 0.95 (0.57–1.58) 0.8545
Model 2 for Max CCA-IMT ( n = 112) ( n = 64) ( n = 48)
Age (1 year increase) 1.01 (0.98–1.05) 0.5564 0.98 (0.90–1.07) 0.6024 1.06 (0.95–1.17) 0.3195
Men (vs. women) 1.04 (0.52–2.11) 0.9141 0.73 (0.27–1.92) 0.5243 1.57 (0.50–4.92) 0.4402
eGFR (10 mL/min/1.73 m 2 increase) 0.68 (0.56–0.81) <0.0001 0.64 (0.48–0.84) 0.0014 0.71 (0.54–0.94) 0.0107
UACR (10 mg/g Cre increase) 1.01 (1.00–1.01) 0.0003 1.02 (1.00–1.03) 0.0121 1.01 (1.00–1.01) 0.0073
Max CCA-IMT (1 mm increase) 1.02 (0.59–1.59) 0.9281 0.96 (0.31–2.50) 0.9410 0.84 (0.43–1.66) 0.6045
Model 3 for Max bulb-IMT ( n = 88) ( n = 48) ( n = 40)
Age (1 year increase) 1.00 (0.96–1.04) 0.9105 0.92 (0.82–1.04) 0.1943 1.05 (0.94–1.17) 0.3862
Men (vs. women) 0.76 (0.33–1.75) 0.5155 0.26 (0.05–1.06) 0.0599 1.20 (0.37–4.27) 0.7666
eGFR (10 mL/min/1.73 m 2 increase) 0.63 (0.51–0.77) <0.0001 0.54 (0.36–0.76) 0.0003 0.72 (0.55–0.93) 0.0125
UACR (10 mg/g Cre increase) 1.01 (1.01–1.02) 0.0004 1.02 (1.01–1.03) 0.0037 1.01 (1.00–1.01) 0.0061
Max bulb-IMT (1 mm increase) 1.65 (0.99–2.56) 0.0525 3.05 (1.42–5.93) 0.0079 1.22 (0.61–2.32) 0.5636
Model 4 for Max ICA-IMT ( n = 82) ( n = 5) ( n = 37)
Age (1 year increase) 0.99 (0.96–1.03) 0.6738 0.91 (0.81–1.01) 0.0840 1.02 (0.91–1.14) 0.7241
Men (vs. women) 0.71 (0.34–1.51) 0.3715 0.47 (0.14–1.55) 0.2139 0.67 (0.19–2.34) 0.5271
eGFR (10 mL/min/1.73 m 2 increase) 0.67 (0.54–0.81) <0.0001 0.63 (0.46–0.84) 0.0016 0.73 (0.54–0.98) 0.0369
UACR (10 mg/g Cre increase) 1.01 (1.00–1.01) 0.0010 1.02 (1.00–1.03) 0.0149 1.01 (1.00–1.02) 0.0048
Max ICA-IMT (1 mm increase) 1.25 (0.86–1.73) 0.2300 2.20 (1.18–4.15) 0.0147 0.94 (0.46–1.60) 0.8517

Variables of IMT, as well as age, sex, eGFR, and UACR, were included in the multivariate model. Regarding IMT in the multivariate model, we assessed four types of IMT: Model 1, Max IMT (1 mm increase); Model 2, Max CCA-IMT (1 mm increase); Model 3, Max bulb-IMT (1 mm increase); Model 4, Max ICA-IMT (1 mm increase). Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; P , calculated probability; n , number; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; UACR, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio; Cre, creatinine; Max IMT, maximum measurable intima-media thickness in the entire scanned common carotid arteries, carotid bulbs, and internal carotid arteries; Max CCA-IMT, maximum intima–media thickness of the common carotid artery; Max bulb-IMT, maximum intima–media thickness of the carotid bulb; Max ICA-IMT, maximum intima–media thickness of the internal carotid artery.