Table 7.
HR (95% CI) | P-value | ||
---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | CRP (mg/L, > 10.0 vs. ≤ 10.0) | 1.532 (1.102-2.128) | 0.011 |
NPS (model 1) | |||
1 vs. 0 | 1.978 (1.250-3.130) | 0.004 | |
2 vs. 0 | 2.903 (1.803-4.675) | <0.001 | |
TNM stage | |||
II vs. I | 1.620 (1.087-2.416) | 0.018 | |
III vs. I | 2.196 (1.494-3.227) | <0.001 | |
Model 2 | CRP (mg/L, > 10.0 vs. ≤ 10.0) | 1.618 (1.171-2.235) | 0.004 |
TNM stage | |||
II vs. I | 1.643 (1.101-2.451) | 0.015 | |
III vs. I | 2.269 (1.544-3.334) | <0.001 | |
NPS (model 2) | |||
1 vs. 0 | 3.072 (1.480-6.380) | 0.003 | |
2 vs. 0 | 5.239 (2.536-10.825) | <0.001 |
ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; NPS, Naples prognostic score; CRP, C-reactive protein; TNM, tumor node metastasis; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; CSS, cancer-specific survival. Model 1: The cut-off values according to the previous published studies. Model 2: The cut-off values according to the ROC curves in the current study.