Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 11.
Published in final edited form as: Ecosyst Serv. 2018;33:124–133. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.06.001

Table 3.

Non-monetary indicator values of restoration alternatives (a,b,c,d) and preference function relationships for planning study.

Benefit indicator Min/Max (Yes/No) a b c d Preference function type (Fig. 3) Threshold q (Fig. 3) Threshold p (Fig. 3)
FR1 beneficiaries (addresses) Max 662 423 389 434 III -- 100
FR2 retention capacity (hectares) Max 0.63 0.68 1.38 1.91 V 0.06 0.2
FR3 substitution (number of dams) Min 3 0 3 3 I -- --
FR4 substitution (percent) Min 5.63 4.04 5.56 5.38 II 5 --
SV1 beneficiaries (addresses) Max 1 15 18 14 II 2 --
SV2 beneficiaries (addresses) Max 30 34 38 42 III -- 10
SV3 access (roads or trails) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes I -- --
SV4 complementarity (number of natural land use types) Max 4 2 4 4 I -- --
SV5 substitution (percent) Min 5.94 0 2.71 4.03 II 5 --
E1 beneficiaries (number of institutions) Max 0 2 1 1 I -- --
E2 substitution (percent) Min 2.57 0.25 3.55 2.63 II 5 --
R1 beneficiaries (addresses) Max 1,006 1,025 1,014 852 II 100 --
R2 beneficiaries (addresses) Max 1,336 1,203 828 933 II 100 --
R3 beneficiaries (addresses) Max 139,151 143,780 135,326 137,402 III -- 5,000
R4 access (bike trails) Yes Yes No Yes Yes I -- --
R5 access (bus stops) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes I -- --
R6 recreational quality (hectares) Max 3.48 68.83 15.88 17.53 II 4.05 --
R7 substitution (percent) Min 18.37 30.84 30.22 31.04 II 3 --
R8 substitution (percent) Min 18.24 13.74 18.38 18.40 II 3 --
R9 substitution (percent) Min 52.19 52.91 53.64 53.41 II 3 --
BW1 beneficiaries (addresses) Max 418 402 470 398 III -- 100
BW2 access (roads or trails) Yes Yes No Yes Yes I -- --
S1 index (percent) Max 67.80 67.77 75.43 73.27 II 3 --
RE1 index (score) Max 14.31 52.52 14.98 12.30 II 3 --

Note: indicator values are rounded to nearest hundredths; Yes/No values were transformed into 1/0 numbers for analytical comparison