Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prostate. 2021 Apr 16;81(8):487–496. doi: 10.1002/pros.24130

Table 4:

Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of the association between pineal parenchyma volume, pineal gland composition, melatonin, and total prostate cancer risk (n = 861), AGES-Reykjavik Study

Parenchyma volume Pineal calcifications and cysts Melatonin level Total prostate cancer cases/participants HR (95% CI)
Age-and creatinine-adjusted
HR (95% CI)
Multivariable-adjusted§
Low No Low 30/193 Ref. Ref.
Low No High 25/124 1.15 (0.66, 2.00) 1.02 (0.58, 1.80)
Low Yes Low 7/60 0.77 (0.34, 1.76) 0.83 (0.36, 1.90)
Low Yes High 7/54 0.74 (0.32, 1.70) 0.67 (0.29, 1.54)
High No Low 23/127 1.22 (0.71, 2.11) 1.21 (0.70, 2.10)
High No High 26/173 0.84 (0.49, 1.45) 0.79 (0.45, 1.38)
High Yes Low 13/50 1.97 (1.03, 3.80)* 1.98 (1.02, 3.84)*
High Yes High 11/80 0.79 (0.39, 1.59) 0.79 (0.39, 1.61)

HR = hazard ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval

Pineal parenchyma volumes were dichotomized by the median for the subsample of 122.6 mm3: low is below or equal to the median and high is above the median.

Urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin levels were dichotomized by the median for the subsample 17.0 ng/mL: low is below or equal to the median and high is above the median.

§

Multivariable-adjusted model adjusted for age, family history of prostate cancer, smoking status, physical activity (never, rarely/occasionally, moderate/high), history of depression, current beta-blocker use, annual doctor’s exam, and creatinine (ng/mL).

*

p<0.05