Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 10;16:33. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00375-y

Table 1.

Summary of the included studies (RCT randomized controlled trial, SSI surgical site infection, iNPWT negative pressure wound therapy, SD standard dressing, Cht chemotherapy, BMI body mass index, IFX infliximab)

Topic Author Year Study type Intervention Setting Number of patients N. of IP Results
Transplanted patients Dean P.G. 2004 RCT Sirolimus vs tacrolimus Kidney transplant 123 All Higher rate of SSI in sirolimus
Siskind E. 2012 Prospective Partial incision closure Kidney transplant 104 All No SSI
Shahrestani S. 2018 Meta-analysis Sirolimus, BMI, different surgical incisions Kidney and pancreas transplant 17821 All Higher rate of hernia in sirolimus
Gurusamy 2014 Review of RCTs Bowel decontamination, Pre- and probiotics, G-CSF Liver transplant 614 All No difference in SSI or complication rate
Shrestha M.S. 2016 Systematic review NPWT for complication Kidney transplant 22 All Heterogeneous
D’Souza K. 2019 Syst rev. of retrospective Drain vs. no drain Kidney transplant 1640 All No difference in SSI or complication rate
Berry 2019 RCT 72 h-long antibiotic prophylaxis vs intraoperatory antibiotic alone Liver transplant 97 All
Colorectal cancer Kabbinavar F. 2005 RCT CHT +/− bevacizumab Metastatic colorectal cancer 209 All /
Hurvitz H. 2004 RCT CHT +/− bevacizumab Metastatic colorectal cancer 813 All /
Scappaticci F.A. 2005 Pooled data from RCT CHT +/− bevacizumab Metastatic colorectal cancer 1132 All SSI: 13% BZ+CH vs 3.4% CH alone
Curran T. 2018 Retrospective iNPWT vs SD High-risk open colorectal surgery 315 61 (chronic steroid/metastatic cancer) SSI: 7% iNPWT vs 15% SD
Crohn disease Bafford A.C. 2013 Retrospective Patients on immunomodulatory therapy Crohn disease 196 127 (on drugs) Same rate of SSI
Canedo J. 2010 Retrospective Patients on IFX, other drugs or assuming no drugs Crohn disease 225 150 (IFX or other drugs) No difference in SSI
Trauma Costa M.L. 2020 RCT iNPWT vs SD High-risk patients 1629 Not specified No difference in SSI rate
Masden D. 2012 RCT iNPWT vs SD High-risk patients 81 7 No difference in SSI rate
Mixed High-risk population BlackHam A.U. 2013 Retrospective iNPWT vs SD Abdominal oncological surgery 191 76 (neoadjuvant cht) SSI: 6.7% iNPWT vs 19.5% SD
Javed A.A. 2019 RCT iNPWT vs SD High-risk pancreatico-duodenectomy 123 77 (neoadjuvant cht) SSI: iNPWT 9% vs 31.1% SD
Murphy P.B. 2019 RCT iNPWT vs SD Open colorectal 288 9 No difference in SSI rate
O’Leary D.P. 2017 RCT iNPWT vs SD Abdominal surgery 49 Not specified SSI: iNPWT 8.3% vs 32% SD
Li P.-Y. 2017 RCT iNPWT vs SD Abdominal, colorectal surgery 71 Not specified SSI: iNPWT 3% vs 23.7% SD
Shen P. 2017 RCT iNPWT vs SD Abdominal, oncological surgery 265 Excluded No difference in SSI rate
Mixed High-risk population Strugala and Martin 2017 Meta-analysis (RCT + observational) iNPWT vs SD All specialities 1863 Not specified SSI: iNPWT 4.8% vs 9.7% SD
Zwanenburg P.R. 2019 Meta-analysis (RCT + observational but only RCT reported) iNPWT vs SD All specialities + subgroup analysis 4398 Not specified No advantage in NPWT if stratified for surgical specialties
Kuper T.M. 2020 Meta-analysis of RCTs iNPWT vs SD Open abdominal 792 Not specified No difference in SSI rate
Sahebally S. 2018 Meta-analysis (RCT + observational) iNPWT vs SD Open abdominal 1187 Not specified NPWT > SD pooled OR 0.25