Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Microbiol. 2020 Dec 10;23(3):e13294. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13294

Table 1.

Ookinete numbers, oocyst density and prevalence in mosquitoes fed on WT, pb22–KO and pb22–restored (pb22–RE) parasites.

Exp. Parasite Ookinete formation in midgut at 24 h Oocyst formation at 12 days

Ookinete-positive midguts (no. dissected) No. ookinetes/positive midgut [Mean (range)] Infection prevalence (no. dissected) a Reduction in prevalence b Oocyst density [Mean (range)] c
1 WT 9 (9) 1187 (300–2730) 93.3% (30) 103.7 (0–300)
pb22–KO 0 (10) 0 0 (30) 93.3% 0
pb22–RE 10 (10) 1154 (420–3000) 93.3% (30) 86.9 (0–302)
2 WT 10 (10) 2230 (500–4550) 86.7% (30) 100.7 (0–319)
pb22–KO 0 (10) 0 0 (29) 86.7% 0
pb22–RE 10 (10) 2065 (750–5300) 96.6% (29) 97.5 (0–303)
3 WT 10 (10) 2280 (1000–3700) 93.1% (29) 110.6 (0–309)
pb22–KO 1 (10) 5 (0–5) 0 (28) 93.1% 0
pb22–RE 9 (9) 1985 (600–5050) 86.7% (30) 96.8 (0–302)
a

The infection prevalence was calculated by the number of mosquitoes with oocysts / number of mosquitoes dissected in each group × 100%.

b

The percent reduction in oocyst prevalence was calculated as % mean prevalence wt – % mean prevalence Pb22-KO.

c

Mean number and range of oocysts per mosquito midgut.

Exp., Experiment.