Skip to main content
. 2021 May 28;11:655316. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.655316

Table 1.

Bevacizumab in ES-SCLC.

Author Regimen Patients ORR (%) Median TTP/PFS (months) Median OS (months) 1-year OS (%) Grade 3-4 toxicity (%)
Spigel DR et al., LUN90 CaIB 51 84 9.1 12.1 51 Thrombocytopenia (53), fatigue (31), dehydration (26), diarrhea (21), hyperglycemia (21), pain (21)
Horn L et al., E3501 CEB 63 63.5 4.7 10.9 38.1 Neutropenia (57.8), thrombocytopenia (14.1), fatigue (14.1)
Ready NE et al., CALGB30306 CIB 72 75 7.0 11.6 43.8 Neutropenia (25), diarrhea (16), dehydration (12), thrombocytopenia (10), fatigue (10), nausea (10)
Spigel DA et al., SALUTE Ca/CEB vs Ca/CEP 102 58 vs 48 5.5 vs 4.4 9.4 vs 10.9 Neutropenia (35), pneumonia (5.9), dyspnea (3.9), thrombocytopenia (4), hypertension (5.9)
Pujol JL et al., IFCT-0802 CT vs CT + B 147 89.2 vs 91.9, p=1.00 5.5 vs 5.3, p=0.82 13.3 vs 11.1, p=0.80 Hypertension (40), thrombosis (11)
Tiseo M et al., FARM6PMFJM CEB vs CEP 204 58.4 vs 55.3, p=0.657 6.7 vs 5.7, p=0.03 9.8 vs 8.9, p=0.11 37 vs 25 Neutropenia (46.3), fatigue (8.4), hypertension (6.3), thrombosis (5.3)

Ca, carboplatin; C, cisplatin; I, irinotecan; E, etoposide; B, bevacizumab; P, placebo; CT, chemotherapy chosen by each center, cisplatin etoposide or cisplatin-cyclophosphamide-epidoxorubicin-etoposide.