TABLE 3.
Improvements From Baseline to Follow-up on the Global Executive Composite (GEC) in the CAPS Versus IRC Treatments in the Entire Sample Older Teens (9th–12th Grade) and Younger Teens (6th–8th Grade)
| CAPS (n = 57) | IRC (n = 62a) | F (df) | P b | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |||||||
| Baseline | 6 Month | Change | Baseline | 6 Month | Change | |||
| Entire Samplea | 58.53 (10.11) | 57.00 (11.40) | −1.53 (8.75) | 61.56 (10.74) | 60.16 (12.16) | −1.40 (7.43) | 0.17 (118) | 0.68 |
| Older Teensa | 60.15 (10.51) | 55.37 (11.44) | −4.78 (6.66) | 61.54 (10.98) | 60.69 (10.94) | −0.86 (5.98) | 6.74 (61) | 0.01 |
| Younger Teens | 57.07 (9.69) | 58.47 (11.37) | 1.40 (9.46) | 61.59 (10.63) | 59.48 (13.77) | −2.11 (9.06) | 1.27 (56) | 0.27 |
CAPS = Counselor Assisted Problem Solving, IRC = Internet Resource Comparison
The total study participants for IRC was 63; however, one participant did not completed the Behavioral Rating Inventory (BRIEF)-Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI) Inhibit subscale, so the GEC could not calculated for this participant and they were excluded from this analysis.
P values apply to differences between CAPS and IRC groups as measured by general linear models after controlling for baseline scores.