. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 11.

Published before final editing as: IEEE Trans Image Process. 2019 Jun 19:10.1109/TIP.2019.2919937. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2019.2919937

TABLE V.

DSC and ASD Comparison With the State-of-the-Art Methods on Pelvic CT Image Dataset. The Boldface Results Indicate no Significant Difference From the Best Result (p-Value < 0.05 in Student’s t-Test). The Parameter Number (Param) of Each Network Is Also Reported

Networks	Prostate	Bladder	Rectum	Param (M)
Networks	DSC(%)			Param (M)
U-Net	86.4±5.1	92.4±5.5	85.8±4.9	20.54
FCN	86.5±4.5	93.1±5.3	85.7±5.3	14.72
DCAN	86.7±3.6	92.6±6.8	85.5±5.4	21.06
2D DenseSeg	87.0±4.3	93.0±7.1	85.3±5.5	1.26
Proposed	88.4±4.2	94.5±4.2	87.4±5.4	3.78
Networks	Prostate	Bladder	Rectum	Param (M)
Networks	ASD(mm)			Param (M)
U-Net	1.511±0.465	1.701±1.840	1.451±0.526	20.54
FCN	1.591±0.532	1.588±2.254	1.443±0.578	14.72
DCAN	1.525±0.521	1.357±1.293	1.514±0.747	21.06
2D DenseSeg	1.521±0.536	1.652±2.578	1.721±1.075	1.26
Proposed	1.346±0.531	1.162±1.196	1.332±0.793	3.78