Skip to main content
. 2021 May 7;47(6):665–673. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06401-6

Table 2.

Primary and secondary outcomes (adjusted for stratification variables)

Outcome Restrictive fluid management (n = 49) Usual care (n = 51) Restrictive fluid management vs usual care (95% CI)a P valueb
Cumulative fluid balance at 72 h from randomization, mean (SD) mLc  − 1080 (2003) 61 (3131)  − 1148 (− 2200; − 97) 0.033
Duration of AKI (days), median [IQR]d 2 [1–3] 3 [2–7]  − 1 (− 3; 0) 0.071
Number of patients-receiving RRT, n (%)e 6/46 (13) 15/50 (30) 0.42 (0.16; 0.91) 0.043
Cumulative fluid balance at 24 h from randomization, mean (SD) mLc  − 416 (1194) 409 (1566)  − 822 ( − 1381; − 264) 0.004
Cumulative fluid balance at ICU discharge/day 7, mean (SD) mLc  − 2166 (2988)  − 650 (4469)  − 1532 (− 3036; − 29) 0.046
Cumulative dose of furosemide per day, median [IQR] mgf 0 (0–19) 1.4 (0–26.2) 0 (− 11; 5.7) 0.700

AKI acute kidney injury, RRT renal replacement therapy

aAdjusted (severity of AKI and presence of fluid overload) difference in means/median or risk ratio with 95% CIs

bP value derived from regression model adjusted for stratification variables (severity of AKI and presence of fluid accumulation)

cThe last available value for cumulative balance was analyzed for all patients even if ICU discharge or consent withdrawal would have occurred before endpoint was fulfilled

dTruncated at 7 days, ICU discharge, or consent withdrawal. Data missing for three patients-receiving restricted fluid management and one in usual care

eTruncated at 14 days (RRT provided post-ICU discharge included)

fPer oral furosemide dose divided by 2 to make it comparable to intravenous doses