Table 2.
Outcome | Restrictive fluid management (n = 49) | Usual care (n = 51) | Restrictive fluid management vs usual care (95% CI)a | P valueb |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cumulative fluid balance at 72 h from randomization, mean (SD) mLc | − 1080 (2003) | 61 (3131) | − 1148 (− 2200; − 97) | 0.033 |
Duration of AKI (days), median [IQR]d | 2 [1–3] | 3 [2–7] | − 1 (− 3; 0) | 0.071 |
Number of patients-receiving RRT, n (%)e | 6/46 (13) | 15/50 (30) | 0.42 (0.16; 0.91) | 0.043 |
Cumulative fluid balance at 24 h from randomization, mean (SD) mLc | − 416 (1194) | 409 (1566) | − 822 ( − 1381; − 264) | 0.004 |
Cumulative fluid balance at ICU discharge/day 7, mean (SD) mLc | − 2166 (2988) | − 650 (4469) | − 1532 (− 3036; − 29) | 0.046 |
Cumulative dose of furosemide per day, median [IQR] mgf | 0 (0–19) | 1.4 (0–26.2) | 0 (− 11; 5.7) | 0.700 |
AKI acute kidney injury, RRT renal replacement therapy
aAdjusted (severity of AKI and presence of fluid overload) difference in means/median or risk ratio with 95% CIs
bP value derived from regression model adjusted for stratification variables (severity of AKI and presence of fluid accumulation)
cThe last available value for cumulative balance was analyzed for all patients even if ICU discharge or consent withdrawal would have occurred before endpoint was fulfilled
dTruncated at 7 days, ICU discharge, or consent withdrawal. Data missing for three patients-receiving restricted fluid management and one in usual care
eTruncated at 14 days (RRT provided post-ICU discharge included)
fPer oral furosemide dose divided by 2 to make it comparable to intravenous doses