Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 27;36(7):1507–1513. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03933-7

Table 2.

Imaging results and intraoperative and histopathological findings

Variable Total (n = 1303) Patients without elevated inflammatory markers (n = 23) Patients with elevated inflammatory markers (n = 1280)
a. Imaging results
Inconclusive (%) 49 (3.8) - 49 (3.8)
Uncomplicated appendicitis (%) 1041 (79.9) 20 (87.0) 1021 (79.8)
Perforated appendicitis (%) 139 (10.7) 1 (4.3) 138 (10.8)
Inflammatory mass (%)* 64 (4.9) 2 (8.7) 62 (4.8)
Inflammatory mass with abscess (%)** 8 (0.6) - 8 (0.6)
No imaging (%) 2 (0.2) - 2 (0.2)
b. Intraoperative findings
Normal appendix (%) 6 (0.5) - 6 (0.5)
Uncomplicated appendicitis (%) 873 (67.0) 19 (82.6) 854 (66.7)
Gangrenous appendicitis (%) 136 (10.4) 3 (13.0) 133 (10.4)
Perforated appendicitis (%) 260 (20.0) 1 (4.3) 259 (20.2)
Iatrogenic perforation (%) 28 (2.1) - 28 (2.2)
c. Histopathological findings
Uncomplicated appendicitis (%) 1015 (77.9) 19 (82.6) 996 (77.8)
Gangrenous appendicitis (%) 137 (10.5) 2 (8.7) 135 (10.5)
Perforated appendicitis (%) 151 (11.6) 2 (8.7) 149 (11.6)

*Intraoperatively, 27 of these patients had perforated or gangrenous appendicitis, of which 18 had purulent peritonitis; 37 patients were diagnosed as uncomplicated appendicitis, but in 7 of these cases purulent peritonitis was seen

**Intraoperatively, 4 of these patients had a perforated appendix, one a gangrenous appendix and three had uncomplicated appendicitis. In six patients locally or advanced purulent peritonitis was found; in two of the uncomplicated cases no peritonitis was described