Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 10;7(7):e711. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001169

TABLE 2.

Results of RT-PCR of miRs in urine sedimentsa

Rejection group No-rejection group
Relative expression Relative expression FC Pb
miR-21-5p 73.8 (2.20–1748.2) 20.0 (2.79–231.4) 3.7 <0.001
miR-25-3p 5.51 (0.73–213.3) 2.24 (0.29–25.4) 2.5 <0.001
miR-126-3p 0.20 (0.01–19.1) 0.05 (0.00–1.19) 4.2 <0.001
miR-142-5p 0.47 (0.04–8.94) 0.50 (0.04–7.10) 0.9 0.374
miR-149-5p 0.19 (0.00–1.96) 0.14 (0.01–1.76) 1.4 0.034
miR-155-5p 0.74 (0.04–171.4) 0.13 (0.01–1.60) 5.7 <0.001
miR-210-3p 2.07 (0.05–54.6) 1.76 (0.21–29.5) 1.2 0.920
miR-615-3p 0.01 (0.00–0.88) 0.03 (0.00–1.39) 0.4 <0.001
miR-203a 20.6 (0.04–502.2) 14.4 (0.75–495.3) 1.4 0.506
miR-224 0.04 (0.00–33.5) 0.06 (0.00–0.74) 0.7 0.090
miR-141-3p 3.38 (0.07–49.4) 2.37 (0.23–47.5) 1.4 0.210
miR-142-3p 17.2 (0.57–257.1) 12.3 (0.66–165.4) 1.4 0.172
miR-223-3p 52.6 (1.93–2041.7) 27.0 (0.64–521.9) 1.9 0.004

aResults are presented as median relative (min-max).

bGroup sizes were 98 rejections and 54 no-rejections. Differences were tested by Mann–Whitney U tests. MiRs with significant P according to a post hoc Bonferroni correction of the alpha level (0.05/13) are shown in bold.

FC, fold change; miR, microRNA.