Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 31;58(7):2487–2496. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04755-1

Table 1.

Treatments tested based on complete 22 factorial design with central point: yields and protein content obtained for different treatments to extract collagen from chicken MSM residue

Treatment Ultrasound time (min) Enzymatic extraction time (h) Yield on wet basis (%) Yield on dry basis (%) Protein level (%)
T1 30 24 5.10b ± 0.26 11.44b ± 0.60 88.62a ± 1.58
T2 30 48 6.74a ± 0.27 15.11a ± 0.62 88.53a ± 2.91
T3 0 48 4.82b ± 0.23 10.80b ± 0.51 87.05a ± 2.21
T4 0 24 3.92c ± 0.21 8.78c ± 0.47 88.34a ± 2.49
PC 15 36 5.37b ± 0.26 12.03b ± 0.58 86.32a ± 1.51

aAverages within the same column with the same superscript letters do not differ significantly from each other by Tukey’s test(p > 0.05). Values expressed as mean ± standard deviation.T1: 30 min of pre-treatment with ultrasound and 24 h of enzymatic extraction; T2: 30 min of pre-treatment with ultrasound and 48 h of enzymatic extraction; T3: 48 h of enzymatic extraction; T4: 24 h of enzymatic extraction; PC: 15 min of pre-treatment with ultrasound and 36 h of enzymatic extraction