Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 12;42(5):983–992. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.06.003

Table 2.

Quality assessment of the included studies

No JBI checklist question (Alsahab et al., 2021) (Aw, Woodrow, Ogliari, & Harwood, 2020) (Blomaard et al., 2021) (Carter et al., 2020) (Chinnadurai et al., 2020) (Cobos-Siles et al., 2020) (Darvall et al., 2020)
1 Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
3 to both exposed and unexposed groups? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4 Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
5 Were confounding factors identified? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
6 Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7 Were the groups/ participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment exposure)? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
8 Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
9 Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10 Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
11 Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 Was appropriate statistical analysis used? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Overall Appraisal Include: 11 Include: 11 Include: 11 Include: 11 Include: 11 Include: 11 Include: 11
Exclude:1 Exclude:1 Exclude:1 Exclude:1 Exclude:1 Exclude:1 Exclude:1
Level of evidence 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study
No JBI checklist question (Fagard et al., 2021) (Hewitt et al., 2020) (Ho et al., 2020) (Kundi et al., 2020) (Labenz et al., 2020) (Marengoni et al., 2021)
1 Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people? 1 1 1 1 1 1
3 to both exposed and unexposed groups? 1 1 1 1 1 1
4 Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? 1 1 1 1 1 1
5 Were confounding factors identified? 1 1 1 1 1 1
6 Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? 1 1 1 1 1 1
7 Were the groups/ participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment exposure)? 1 1 1 1 1 1
8 Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? 1 1 1 1 1 1
9 Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur? 1 1 1 1 1 1
10 Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? 1 1 1 1 1 1
11 Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized? 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 Was appropriate statistical analysis used? 1 1 1 1 1 1
Overall Appraisal Include: 11 Include: 11 Include: 11 Include: 11 Include: 11 Include: 11
Exclude:1 Exclude:1 Exclude:1 Exclude:1 Exclude:1 Exclude:1
Level of evidence 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study
No JBI checklist question (Mendes et al., 2020) (Moloney et al., 2020) (Petermann-Rocha et al., 2020) (Poco et al., 2021) (Osuafor et al., 2020) (Owen et al., 2020)
1 Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people? 1 1 1 1 1 1
3 to both exposed and unexposed groups? 1 1 1 1 1 1
4 Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? 1 1 1 1 1 1
5 Were confounding factors identified? 1 1 1 1 1 1
6 Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? 1 1 1 1 1 1
7 Were the groups/ participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment exposure)? 1 1 1 1 1 1
8 Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? 1 1 1 1 1 1
9 Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur? 1 1 1 1 1 1
10 Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? 1 1 1 1 1 1
11 Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized? 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 Was appropriate statistical analysis used? 1 1 1 1 1 1
Overall Appraisal Include: 11 Include: 11 Include: 11 Include: 11 Include: 11 Include: 11
Exclude:1 Exclude:1 Exclude:1 Exclude:1 Exclude:1 Exclude:1
Level of evidence 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study
No JBI checklist question (Sablerolles et al., 2021) (Tehrani, Killander, Åstrand, Jakobsson, & Gille-Johnson, 2020) (Vlachos et al., 2021)
1 Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? 1 1 1
2 Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people? 1 1 1
3 to both exposed and unexposed groups? 1 1 1
4 Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? 1 1 1
5 Were confounding factors identified? 1 1 1
6 Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? 1 1 1
7 Were the groups/ participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment exposure)? 1 1 1
8 Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? 1 1 1
9 Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur? 1 1 1
10 Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? 1 1 1
11 Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized? 0 0 0
12 Was appropriate statistical analysis used? 1 1 1
Overall Appraisal Include: 11 Include: 11 Include: 11
Exclude:1 Exclude:1 Exclude:1
Level of evidence 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study 3.b cohort study