Table 2.
Regression models for predicting weight and fat mass loss at week 9
| Model | B | R2 adjusted | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight loss at week 9 | 88% | < 0.001 | |
| Intercept | 21.669 | < 0.001 | |
| Metabolic adaptation | −0.009 | < 0.001 | |
| Adherence to the diet | −0.069 | < 0.001 | |
| Average PAL | −6.141 | < 0.001 | |
| Sex | −0.304 | 0.711 | |
| FM at baseline | −0.093 | < 0.001 | |
| FFM at baseline | −0.277 | < 0.001 | |
| CHO group | 1.490 | < 0.001 | |
| Fat mass loss at week 9 | 93% | < 0.001 | |
| Intercept | 19.275 | < 0.001 | |
| Metabolic adaptation | −0.008 | < 0.001 | |
| Adherence to the diet | −0.079 | < 0.001 | |
| Average PAL | −6.023 | < 0.001 | |
| Sex | −1.932 | < 0.001 | |
| FM at baseline | −0.088 | < 0.001 | |
| FFM at baseline | −0.120 | < 0.001 | |
| CHO group | 1.111 | < 0.001 |
Sex: 1 females; 2 males. PAL: physical activity level; CHO: carbohydrate; FM: fat mass; FFM: fat-free mass