Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Ther. 2021 Apr 15;142:103860. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103860

Table 1.

Significant clusters of interest resulting from whole brain analyses

Left Ventral Striatum Connectivity
Group × Time × Gain vs. Loss
k F1,26 x y z BA Region
42 34.6 30 −71 28 39, 19 Right Middle Occipital Gyrus

Right Ventral Striatum Connectivity
Group × Time × Loss vs. No Incentive
k F1,26 x y z BA Region
31 25.6 −19 −61 17 31 Left Cuneus

Left Anterior Insula Connectivity
Group × Time × Gain vs. No Incentive
k F1,26 x y z BA Region
32 20.5 26 −12 42 6 Right Middle Frontal Gyrus
Group × Time × Loss vs. No Incentive
k F1,26 x y z BA Region
35 16.7 −16 20 3 - Left Ventral Striatum

Right Anterior Insula Connectivity
Group × Time × Loss vs. No Incentive
k F1,26 x y z BA Region
52 21.5 −12 −96 3 18, 17 Left Lingual Gyrus
33 25 −40 20 17 46 Left Middle Frontal Gyrus
31 21.7 30 −75 28 31 Right Middle Occipital Gyrus

Anterior Cingulate Cortex Connectivity
Group × Time × Loss vs. No Incentive
k F1,26 x y z BA Region
109 32.5 −16 17 7 - Left Ventral Striatum
72 24.4 30 −75 21 19, 7, 39 Right Middle Occipital Gyrus
54 24.8 5 −68 −1 18, 23 Bilateral Cuneus
43 22.1 −16 −71 28 19, 7 Left Precuneus
35 21.7 23 24 35 8 Right Middle Frontal Gyrus
29 21.1 12 −57 59 7 Right Precuneus

BA=Brodmann area; Clusters significant at whole-brain-corrected threshold of p<.05 (see Method for details on cluster threshold); extracted values for bolded clusters are presented in Figures 13. A full list of clusters that emerged across all contrasts, including task effects, is available in the Supplement, Table S3.