Table 4.
Stance time detected by kinetic, acceleration and integrated detection methods.
| Section | Side | Kinetic Detection | Acceleration Detection | Integrated Detection | F | p | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD), ms | Mean (SD), ms | ∆% | LOA% | Mean (SD), ms | ∆% | LOA% | ||||
| Straight | Right | 713.1 (243.3) | 730.5 (252.2) * | 2.4 | 95.4 | 738.8 (259.4) * | 3.6 | 94.2 | 15.236 | <0.001 |
| Left | 736.7 (261.2) | 740.2 (250.1) | 0.5 | 91.8 | 744.8 (264.6) | 1.1 | 90.1 | 0.670 | 0.512 | |
| Curve | Right | 614.7 (142.6) | 629.4 (153.5) * | 2.4 | 96.1 | 632.3 (150.2) * | 2.9 | 93.4 | 92.298 | <0.001 |
| Left | 587.6 (127.1) | 587.8 (108.5) | 0.0 | 93.8 | 583.3 (102.2) | 0.7 | 95.0 | 0.479 | 0.619 | |
The differences between the acceleration and integrated detection methods and the kinetic detection methods are shown as ∆%. The proportion of cases within the limits of agreement is shown as LOA%. The F value and p value were obtained by the repeated measures analysis of variance. * Significantly different from the kinetic detection method in the post-hoc analysis.