Table 2.
Staff sample description.
| Sample Size n = 554 | n | % |
|---|---|---|
|
Sex Male Female |
193 334 |
35% 60% |
| Age (Years) | 32.6 | DT (13.7) |
|
Type of university Face to face Online NA |
504 29 21 |
91% 5% 4% |
|
Country Spain Colombia Chile Nicaragua |
376 125 10 43 |
68% 23% 2% 8% |
|
Size of city/town Countryside/suburb Large city Small city/town |
41 319 177 |
7.4% 58% 32% |
|
Lockdown was beneficial No Yes NA |
329 134 91 |
59.4% 24.2% 16.4% |
|
My professional experience Negatively impacted Not impacted Positively impacted NA |
204 196 128 26 |
37% 35.4% 23% 4.7% |
|
Online teaching experience Online teaching is possible but in person it is better Online teaching was not a good experience Online teaching is great and should continue NA |
279 127 78 70 |
50.5% 23% 14% 12% |
|
Teaching continuation I continued teaching online It was not possible NA |
423 8 97 |
76.4% 1.5% 17% |
|
Social life Negatively impacted Social life suffered but I had support Positively impacted |
110 305 105 |
20% 55% 19% |
|
Financial difficulties No Yes NA |
297 182 75 |
54% 33% 13.5% |
Note: NA = no answer/not applicable.