Components |
Cell structure, grade, stromal and immune cells, Lymphovascular invasion, DNA seq, RNA seq, gene signatures |
CTCs, cell free nucleic acids, exosomes, tumor educated platelets |
Cell free DNA, urinary mRNA, miRNA, lnc RNA, other snc RNA, exosomes |
Advantages |
|
Minimally invasive procedure
Early detection and molecular profile assessment
Intratumor heterogeneity
Real time monitoring of cancer evolution
Corelates with tumor burden
Identifies genetic markers of treatment and treatment resistance
DNA fresh and not modified by storage technique
Quick turnaround testing time for ctDNA
ctDNA more beneficial in metastatic setting
|
Noninvasive procedure
Early detection and molecular profile assessment
Intratumor heterogeneity
Large quantities available and centrifuged for concentrates
High DNA yield
Identifies genetic markers of treatment and treatment resistance
Good for longitudinal follow up
ucfDNA can potentially help in localizing “cancer of unknown primary”
|
Disadvantages |
Invasive procedure, involves patient risk
Lacks assessment of intratumor heterogeneity
Time period of analysis fixed
Repetitive invasive biopsies cumbersome
Early detection of cancer not possible
DNA quality highly variable in FFPE
Variable quantity of DNA based on sampling methods, high risk of DNA degradation
|
Investigational setting
High FNR
Lack of standardized technique for cfDNA and cellular genomic DNA
ctDNA quality and extraction methods.
Short half life of CTCs (1–2.4 h) in peripheral blood
|
Investigational setting
No histological assessment
Effect of hydration status and medications
ucfDNA integrity sensitivity and specificity issues
Artifacts from microchip analysis
Variations in assay protocols/sample handling
Measurement of urinary RNAs challenging
Lack of large multicenter studies
|