TABLE 5.
Meta-analytic results of the CR validity for predicting training proficiency.
|
Bare-bones meta-analysis |
Psychometric meta-analysis |
||||||||||
| K | N | r | S2r | SDr | rop | ρ | SDρ | 90% CV | 95% CIρ | %VE | |
| CR–training proficiency | 15 | 3,705 | 0.27 | 0.0190 | 0.138 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.168 | 0.16 | 0.28–0.47 | 19 |
| CR 3-item | 14 | 3,649 | 0.27 | 0.0193 | 0.139 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.170 | 0.16 | 0.28–0.47 | 18 |
| Other CR tests | 6 | 1,650 | 0.25 | 0.0185 | 0.136 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.152 | 0.11 | 0.17–0.44 | 18 |
K, the number of validity coefficients; N, the total sample size; r, the observed average validity weighted by the study sample size; , the observed variance of r; SD_r, the standard deviation of r; rop, the operational validity; ρ, the true validity; SDρ, the standard deviation of ρ; 90% CV, the 90% credibility value; 95% CI, the 95% confidence interval of ρ; %VE, the percentage of observed variance explained by artifacts.