Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 14.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2021 May 4;35(5):109083. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109083

Figure 1. Viral transfection and gamma-band resonance to stimulation.

Figure 1.

(A–C) Confocal microscopy images of immunohistochemistry performed on slices from area 17 after viral transfection.

(A) Endogenous fluorescence of ChR2-eYFP.

(B) Fluorescence from secondary antibody after staining for GABA+.

(C) Merged images, testing for neuronal co-labeling with ChR2-eYFP and GABA+ antibody. No co-labeled neurons can be found.

(D) Counts of GABA+-labeled neurons, EYFP+-labeled neurons, and co-labeled neurons in area 17.

(E) Example recording site in area 17 shows strong gamma-band activity in the local field potential induced by constant illumination.

(F) Robust MUA response to constant illumination at the same site.

(G) Spike-triggered LFP for example data shown in (E) and (F).

(H) Average MUA spike density change as a result of optogenetic stimulation. Smoothed by a Gaussian function (σ = 12.5 ms, truncated at ±2σ).

(I) Average LFP power ratio (optogenetic stimulation versus baseline) spectrum. Note different y axis scales for lower and higher frequency ranges.

(J) Average MUA-LFP PPC spectrum. Note different y axis scales for lower- and higher-frequency ranges.

(I and J) Use ±0.5-s epochs for the analyses from 4 to 20 Hz, and ±0.25-s-long epochs for the analyses from 20 to 150 Hz.

(F–J) Blue (yellow) lines show data obtained with 473 (594) nm light stimulation. Shaded area indicates ±1 SEM across trials. (H–J) Black bars at the bottom indicate frequency ranges with statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between blue and yellow light stimulation, based on a cluster-level permutation test including correction for the multiple comparisons across frequencies.